"The House of the Dead" by Fyodor Dostoevsky: Over the years, thanks to Hollywood and cable TV, we've grown accustomed to various accounts of prison life, ranging from the atrocious to the absurd. But in 1861, Dostoevsky's "The House of the Dead" gave the Russian people a revealing, and often disturbing, view of what passed for life in its gulags.

And Dostoevsky could speak from experience. In 1849, at the age of 28, the author was arrested for his involvement with the Petrashevsky Circle, a socialist discussion group. With revolutions breaking out across Europe in the 1840s, Czar Nicholas I cracked down on all things subversive, and he cracked down hard. Dostoevsky was held in solitary confinement for nearly a year and then sentenced to death by firing squad. Hard to get happy after that one. Ah, but that nutty Czar was just having a bit of fun, ordering the execution to be commuted at the last moment, sentencing Dostoevsky to four years of penal servitude in Siberia, instead. This brush with death shook Dostoevsky to his core, causing him to find religion and greatly influencing his later works.

Before his arrest, Dostoevsky had already established himself as a major literary talent with the publication of "Poor Folk" (1846) and "The Double" (1846). However, his four years of penal servitude were also followed by four years of compulsory military service in Siberia. This extended interruption in the prime of his writing career had many wondering if he'd ever be able to recapture his earlier success. "The House of the Dead" erased all doubts.

While Dostoevsky based the material on his own experiences in prison, he doesn't appear anywhere within the text. The book's main character is Alexandr Petrovitch Goryanchikov, a Russian gentleman and landowner sentenced to ten years of penal servitude in Siberia for murdering his wife. The story opens with an unnamed narrator telling how he first encountered Alexandr Petrovitch, who at the time was living a solitary life as a tutor in a small Siberian town. Everyone knows the man's past, but he's respected for his intelligence and accepted due to his gentle, unassuming manner. The narrator makes several attempts to befriend the reclusive scholar only to have each advance met with polite disapproval. Upon returning to the town after three months away, the narrator learns that Alexandr Petrovitch had died of the flu without ever calling for a doctor. The sad news does little to quell the narrator's interest, and he's able to procure some of the dead man's writings. The narrator presents these manuscripts, a collection of Alexandr Petrovitch's experiences in prison, to the reader, hoping to shine a light on their author and on the strange, hitherto unknown world he was forced to inhabit.

Alexandr Petrovitch's story lacks a central plot or even truly linear storytelling. It's told in short scenes, each focused on different aspects of prison life, from the daily interactions of the convicts to the harsh, brutal treatment of their captors.

It was a completely different environment than the modern jail. Inmates were housed in large groups, not individual cells, all sleeping on a common mat. For purposes of identification, some wore different colored uniforms or had only half their head shaved, while the most serious offenders also had their faces branded. Since it was a camp of penal servitude, and the convicts ventured outside the prison walls to work, each man was fettered with a pair of iron leg shackles that became part of his body, never to come off until his sentence had been served. Corporal punishment was also alive and well. A prisoner who got out of line could be given 500, 1000, or even as many as 2000 strokes across the back, with the more severe punishments often resulting in death. Gruesome descriptions are offered of the aftermaths of such attacks. There's also a shockingly vivid portrayal of a trip to a local bath house that seems to be drawn straight from the depths of Hell.

The convicts themselves were a mixed lot. While nearly all had committed murder, there was no such thing as justifiable homicide. A man forced to kill in self-defense served right alongside the grizzled, lifelong felon or the beastly savage who slaughtered innocent children. There was also a severe division amongst classes. The majority of the inmates were of peasant stock, condemning members of the gentry to natural scorn and mistrust. Alexandr Petrovitch is painfully reminded of this disparity when he attempts to join a mass complaint against the poor quality of prison food and is rudely dismissed by the other convicts. When he asks why he wasn't allowed to stand with his comrades in protest, he is simply told, "How can you be our comrade?"

Since Alexandr Petrovitch's manuscripts are the work of memory, time plays a significant part in their telling. The first section discusses his initial impressions upon entering the prison, the details remaining clear and strong even to the day the author placed pen to paper. Many of the events in the second half of the book occurred during his final months of confinement when there was true hope of freedom. However, the numerous years in between are glossed over, washed away in the monotony of lifeless routine.

One portion of the book that will undoubtedly linger with readers is called "Akulka's Husband." Alexandr Petrovitch relates a story he overhears in which one of his fellow inmates explains the reason for his conviction. The man coldly recounts how he abused his wife, eventually murdering her in a fit of jealous anger. There is no remorse, no sorrow. The details of the act are positively chilling, not only for the heinous nature of the crime and the man who committed it, but also for what it reveals about Alexandr Petrovitch. After all, why did he choose to share this story? We know that he, too, is convicted of murdering his own wife, but he never once discusses his crime. In fact, it's almost impossible to imagine him as being capable of any violent or cruel act, let alone murder. Yet confronting the other man's brutality reminds the reader of exactly why Alexandr Petrovitch is in the situation he's in. He's a murderer. He killed his wife. Another poor woman like Akulka is dead because of Alexandr Petrovitch. Although, in a beautiful piece of craftsmanship, Dostoevsky provides evidence to Alexandr Petrovitch's regret and deep sorrow with a simple, easily overlooked line in the first five pages of the book. Look for it.

"The House of the Dead" is a rich depiction of not only Russian prison camps but also the men who fill their icy walls. Dostoevsky explores the good and evil of man, finding humanity in the most unlikely places. And it's all natural and effortless, nothing is ever staged or overly dramatic. He presents the book and its characters exactly how they are, there's no need for attention-grabbing stunts or cheap literary tricks. The truth is there on the page. It's a quiet, subdued work of genius.

RATING: