|
The 70 proof staff enjoys three things above all else. And it just so happens that reading is third behind only... well, let's just say it's third. Every few weeks we'll provide brief reviews of the books we've been reading in hopes of helping you, our valued readers, make better choices the next time you're at the library, book store, or refined brothel. We rate books on a scale of zero to four shots, with four being a work of true genius. Feel free to let us know if you have any books in particular you would like us to address. April 22, 2002
When Dr. Bernard Rieux finds a dead rat on his doorstep, it's a harbinger of things to come. Soon the entire town is ravaged by the dreaded disease. The story is told after the fact by a mysterious narrater whose identity isn't revealed until the final pages. The device eliminates any doubt as to the question of whether or not the town survives, directing the reader's attention instead towards the relationships and circumstances facing the suffering populace. If this book was only that, a depiction of how a town deals with the onslaught of disease, it would have been excellent. But Camus doesn't stop there. He always has a lot more goin' on under the surface. It's against this horrid backdrop that he deals with the eternal questions of life, love, and death. The illness itself becomes secondary. For it's the unexamined life that is the true plague. This book is a masterpiece.
RATING:
Then one day, after suffering a somewhat tragic personal loss of the human variety, Dennis finds it necessary to make funeral arrangements at Whispering Glades, a funeral parlor at the other end of the spectrum from the Happier Hunting Ground. Everything about Whispering Glades is first class. Including the help. While there Dennis meets the lovely Aimee Thanatogenos, whose job it is to apply makeup to the dead bodies. Could there be any doubt that these two crazy kids would fall in love? In case there was any doubt, Dennis lies, cheats, connives, and manipulates his way into Aimee's heart. What a guy. This is a short, compact tale of failed love, death, and life through death. It's smart and wickedly funny. There's one moment in particular, when Aimee discovers the truth about where Dennis works, that never fails to bring a smile upon reflection. Rating this book was extremely difficult. It's more entertaining than enlightening. It's not really significant enough to warrant four shots; that is to say it lacks that little extra something needed to achieve such an honor. But our affection for "The Loved One" is almost enough to sneak it in under the wire. Almost. As it is, put it at the top of all three-shot books.
RATING:
The only real reason to read this book is to familiarize oneself with Mr. Powell's work. There's simply no denying that he's an exceptional writer. Unfortunately, "At Lady Molly's" offers nothing unique or particularly memorable. But I guess that's one of the problems when trying to string together an 11-book series involving the same characters; each installment can't be titanic or the poor souls would be worn out by the time book three rolls around. Either way, it pales in comparison to Aldous Huxley's "Point Counter Point", which is a far superior look at English society, albeit at an earlier place in time. Even though it doesn't belong among the truly great novels, "At Lady Molly's" is still quite good. Give it a read for no other reason than to study its author.
RATING:
So Maria gets sent to a convent where she's horribly mistreated by the sisters, which only adds fuel to the fire. A priest eventually gets called in to try and handle her case. It's not long before Father Delaura falls in love with young Maria. I know, I know, she's only 12. But considering the current state of affairs, at least she's not an altar boy. This book starts out slowly, but it's worth the wait. Aside from offering some interesting takes on love and religion, there are also one or two jokes that should draw a laugh. The ending is great. And a good ending can make up a lot of ground.
RATING:
Naturally, Karl gets involved in all sorts of wacky misadventures due to his naivety and innocent outlook on life. Of course, most of the time you'll just want to smack Karl upside the head for being so dumb. Any conflicts perpetuated solely by the stupidity of the character are a waste of time. This book is a mess. It reads like it was patched together from old notes and neglected drafts. Oh wait, that's because it was. All Kafka's books were compiled, reedited, and sometimes even added to by a friend of his who ignored Kafka's last request to have his writings burned upon his death. It's not really fair being so hard on "Amerika" considering the product read could be vastly different than the vision Kafka had intended. But, as it is, there isn't really much to like. I kept trying to find deeper meanings in Karl's journey and his encounters only to come up empty each and every time. Just when it seems as though there's going to be some profound knowledge gained, the story breaks off in another direction leaving issues unresolved and past characters forgotten. It can be argued that Kafka is trying to make a statement about the nature of authority, but I think that would be wishful thinking. The truth is that this is Kafka trying to be Charles Dickens. That's never a good thing. I had an uncle once that thought he was Henry Winkler. Sure, he looked good in the leather jacket and it was kind of cool the way we never needed quarters to play the jukebox, but how many times can you hear "Ay!" before it gets on your nerves? I'll tell ya how many. Sixteen. Yeah, that's right. Sixteen times. After that I just wanted to break off his thumbs and shove 'em up his carburetor. But that's neither here nor there. The point is you have to be true to yourself. One Charles Dickens is enough, thank you very much. Having said all that, you still might want to give "Amerika" a read if you're a fan of Kafka's other work. His usual deft style is on display and sections of the book are quite enjoyable. Just don't expect them to add up to anything of importance.
RATING:
RATING:
|